Sharma v Strathfield Municipal Council [2019] NSWLEC 1245
As the parties reached agreement at conciliation and all jurisdictional requirements for the grant of development consent were satisfied, the Court is required by s 34(3) of the LEC Act to make orders in accordance with the parties’ decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Development Appeal (class 1) / Decision Following Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'refusal of Development Application' 'conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the LEC Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Appeal (class 1) / Decision Following Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to the applicant to rely on amended plans' 'Whether development consent should be granted for demolition and construction of a residential dwelling and basement car parking']
Ratio Decidendi
As the parties reached agreement at conciliation and all jurisdictional requirements for the grant of development consent were satisfied, the Court is required by s 34(3) of the LEC Act to make orders in accordance with the parties’ decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['Leave is granted to the applicant to rely on the amended architectural and landscape plans set out in condition 2.1 of Annexure A.' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development consent is granted to Development Application No. DA2018/37 for the demolition of existing buildings and construction of a two storey residential...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment