Williams v Blue Mountains City Council [2009] NSWLEC 1261
Clause 34.4(a) and clause 34.1(b) of the Blue Mountains City Council Local Environmental Plan are development standards, not outright prohibitions; therefore, a SEPP 1 objection may be lodged in respect of them.
- Parties
- Applicant: Ralph Douglas Williams; Respondent: Blue Mountains City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Preliminary Jurisdictional Question
- Outcome
- Applicant's questions answered: Clause 34.4(a) and 34.1(b) are development standards; SEPP 1 objection may be lodged.
- Legal Topics
- Development Standards, Subdivision Controls, Regulatory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ralph Douglas Williams
Applicant
Blue Mountains City Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Preliminary Jurisdictional Question
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 34.4(a) of the Blue Mountains City Council LEP is a development standard or a prohibition
- 2 Whether clause 34.1(b) of the Blue Mountains City Council LEP is a development standard or a prohibition
- 3 Whether a SEPP 1 objection may be lodged
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 34.4(a) and clause 34.1(b) of the Blue Mountains City Council Local Environmental Plan are development standards, not outright prohibitions; therefore, a SEPP 1 objection may be lodged in respect of them.
Court Disposition
Applicant's questions answered: Clause 34.4(a) and 34.1(b) are development standards; SEPP 1 objection may be lodged.
Orders
- Clause 34.4(a) of the BMCC LEP is a development standard.
- Clause 34.1(b) of the BMCC LEP is a development standard.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment