Williams v Blue Mountains City Council [2009] NSWLEC 1261

Williams v Blue Mountains City Council [2009] NSWLEC 1261

Clause 34.4(a) and clause 34.1(b) of the Blue Mountains City Council Local Environmental Plan are development standards, not outright prohibitions; therefore, a SEPP 1 objection may be lodged in respect of them.

Parties
Applicant: Ralph Douglas Williams; Respondent: Blue Mountains City Council
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 August 2009
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Preliminary Jurisdictional Question
Outcome
Applicant's questions answered: Clause 34.4(a) and 34.1(b) are development standards; SEPP 1 objection may be lodged.
Legal Topics
Development Standards, Subdivision Controls, Regulatory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ralph Douglas Williams

Applicant

Blue Mountains City Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Development Application Appeal / Preliminary Jurisdictional Question

  1. 1 Whether clause 34.4(a) of the Blue Mountains City Council LEP is a development standard or a prohibition
  2. 2 Whether clause 34.1(b) of the Blue Mountains City Council LEP is a development standard or a prohibition
  3. 3 Whether a SEPP 1 objection may be lodged

Ratio Decidendi

Clause 34.4(a) and clause 34.1(b) of the Blue Mountains City Council Local Environmental Plan are development standards, not outright prohibitions; therefore, a SEPP 1 objection may be lodged in respect of them.

Court Disposition

Applicant's questions answered: Clause 34.4(a) and 34.1(b) are development standards; SEPP 1 objection may be lodged.

Orders

  • Clause 34.4(a) of the BMCC LEP is a development standard.
  • Clause 34.1(b) of the BMCC LEP is a development standard.