Tanwar v Aslam [2022] NSWCA 149
Mr Ghazi should be removed as a party to the appeal, in accordance with UCPR r 7.10(2)(a), as joinder of his estate would entail delay and expense without being necessary to resolve the appeal. Multiple permutations exist in which his estate's participation is unnecessary, and the course best consistent with s 56 of the Civil Procedure Act is to proceed without the third respondent.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Directions
- Outcome
- Third respondent removed as party; directions for submissions and case management; liberty to apply granted to Nominal Insurer.
- Legal Topics
- ['joinder and Removal of Parties' 'death of Party' 'workers Compensation' 'directions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether third respondent (deceased) should be removed as a party to the appeal' 'Consequences for insurers and liability depending on outcome of appeal regarding employer status and injury findings']
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Ghazi should be removed as a party to the appeal, in accordance with UCPR r 7.10(2)(a), as joinder of his estate would entail delay and expense without being necessary to resolve the appeal. Multiple permutations exist in which his estate's participation is unnecessary, and the course best consistent with s 56 of the Civil Procedure Act is to proceed without the third respondent.
Court Disposition
Third respondent removed as party; directions for submissions and case management; liberty to apply granted to Nominal Insurer.
Orders
- ['First and second respondents to file and serve submissions on or before Monday 22 August 2022.' "Stand the appeal over for directions in the Registrar's list on Wednesday 24 August 2022 with a view to allocation of a date." 'Grant leave to the Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer to relist the appeal before the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment