Lee v Randwick City Council [2021] NSWLEC 1200
The amended proposal, including removal of specified unauthorised work, reduction and articulation of the rear western facade, planter box treatment, and privacy treatments to windows, adequately reduced bulk and overlooking impacts, was compatible with the locality and R2 zone objectives despite existing non-compliance with floor space ratio and height controls, and appropriately required completion of works before issue of the building information certificate and subdivision steps; accordingly the appeals were upheld and the relevant consent, modification approval and direction to issue a building information certificate were warranted on agreed conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeals Concerning a Building Information Certificate Application, a Development Application for Use, and a Modification Application for Subdivision Consent / Hearing After Conciliation Under Ss 34 and 34 AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Was Terminated
- Outcome
- All three appeals were upheld; development consent was granted, the modification application was approved, and the Council was directed to issue a building information certificate after satisfaction that required works and notification had occurred.
- Legal Topics
- ['building Information Certificate' 'development Consent' 'modification Application' 'dual Occupancy' 'unauthorised Building Works' 'overlooking' 'bulk and Scale' 'floor Space Ratio' 'building Height' 'subdivision']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeals Concerning a Building Information Certificate Application, a Development Application for Use, and a Modification Application for Subdivision Consent / Hearing After Conciliation Under Ss 34 and 34 AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Was Terminated
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a building information certificate should be directed for unauthorised works carried out otherwise than in accordance with development consent' 'Whether consent should be granted for use of the unauthorised works as altered and remediated' 'Whether modification of the subdivision consent should be approved so that subdivision certificate and release of subdivision plans occur only after required works are completed' 'Whether the amended proposal adequately addressed impacts from overlooking, visual privacy, bulk, scale, floor space ratio and building height' 'Whether the proposal was compatible with the R2 low-density residential zone objectives and the character of the locality']
Ratio Decidendi
The amended proposal, including removal of specified unauthorised work, reduction and articulation of the rear western facade, planter box treatment, and privacy treatments to windows, adequately reduced bulk and overlooking impacts, was compatible with the locality and R2 zone objectives despite existing non-compliance with floor space ratio and height controls, and appropriately required completion of works before issue of the building information certificate and subdivision steps; accordingly the appeals were upheld and the relevant consent, modification approval and direction to issue a building information certificate were warranted on agreed conditions.
Court Disposition
All three appeals were upheld; development consent was granted, the modification application was approved, and the Council was directed to issue a building information certificate after satisfaction that required works and notification had occurred.
Orders
- ['In proceedings 2020/194590, the appeal is upheld.' 'In proceedings 2020/194590, the Applicant is to carry out the construction works approved by Condition 1 of development consent number DA/277/2020 at 36-38 Jennings Street, Matraville.' 'In proceedings 2020/194590, the Applicant is to notify the Council in...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment