Barhom v Randwick City Council [2024] NSWLEC 1357
The size of each lot resulting from a strata subdivision must be calculated in accordance with the SSD Act as the area shown on the floor plan on the registered strata plan. The proposed lots of 298m2 and 376m2 do not meet the pre-amendment 400m2 minimum but are compliant with the now-applicable 275m2 standard. The delay in the amendment's operation is not a reason to refuse the application, and the relevant written request justifies the non-compliance. The subdivision will not create additional dwelling entitlements, nor does it offend zone objectives relating to housing affordability and community needs. Consent is therefore granted under cl 4.6.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted with conditions
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'strata Subdivision' 'minimum Lot Size' 'exceptions to Development Standards' 'interpretation of Planning Instruments' 'zone Objectives' 'housing Affordability']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["How is 'the size of each lot resulting from the subdivision' calculated under cl 4.1A(4)(a) of the RLEP?" 'Whether development consent can be granted for strata subdivision notwithstanding non-compliance with minimum strata lot size' 'Consistency of the proposed strata subdivision with zone objectives concerning housing affordability and housing needs']
Ratio Decidendi
The size of each lot resulting from a strata subdivision must be calculated in accordance with the SSD Act as the area shown on the floor plan on the registered strata plan. The proposed lots of 298m2 and 376m2 do not meet the pre-amendment 400m2 minimum but are compliant with the now-applicable 275m2 standard. The delay in the amendment's operation is not a reason to refuse the application, and the relevant written request justifies the non-compliance. The subdivision will not create additional dwelling entitlements, nor does it offend zone objectives relating to housing affordability and community needs. Consent is therefore granted under cl 4.6.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted with conditions
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'The development application (DA/118/2023) for the strata subdivision of 12 Nurla Avenue, Little Bay is determined by the grant of development consent subject to the conditions in Annexure A.' 'Exhibits A-C and 4 are retained and exhibits D-F and 1-3 are returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment