Hayek v Randwick City Council [2023] NSWLEC 1397
On the balance of evidence, the existing building does not meet the threshold of any of the requisite criteria for local heritage listing, and is not likely, on further inquiry or investigation, to be found to be of local heritage significance. Accordingly, the Interim Heritage Order is to be revoked.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Interim Heritage Order revoked.
- Legal Topics
- ['interim Heritage Order' 'heritage Significance' 'local Environmental Plan' 'heritage Act 1977']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the property may, on further inquiry or investigation, be found to be of local heritage significance for the purposes of an Interim Heritage Order']
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of evidence, the existing building does not meet the threshold of any of the requisite criteria for local heritage listing, and is not likely, on further inquiry or investigation, to be found to be of local heritage significance. Accordingly, the Interim Heritage Order is to be revoked.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Interim Heritage Order revoked.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'The Interim Heritage Order published in the New South Wales Government Gazette, No 217, 19 May 2023 over 21 Baden Street, Coogee, is revoked.' 'The exhibits, other than Exhibits 2, A and B, are returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment