Gupta v Fordham Laboratories Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 694
Fordham should pay 85% of Mr Gupta's costs of the proceedings, reflecting Mr Gupta's primary success and the discrete success of Fordham on some cross-claim issues, and a gross sum costs order should be made for $45,000 net of GST to avoid protracted costs assessment.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ranjan Gupta; Defendant: Fordham Laboratories Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Determination: Equity Proceedings and Cross Claim / Post Judgment: Determination of Costs Following Judgment
- Outcome
- Defendant ordered to pay Plaintiff's costs, fixed sum
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Specific Performance, Cross Claim, Gross Sum Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ranjan Gupta
Plaintiff
Fordham Laboratories Pty Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Determination: Equity Proceedings and Cross Claim / Post Judgment: Determination of Costs Following Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the general rule that costs follow the event should be displaced
- 2 Whether costs should be apportioned due to partial success on cross-claim
- 3 Whether an order for gross sum costs should be made
Ratio Decidendi
Fordham should pay 85% of Mr Gupta's costs of the proceedings, reflecting Mr Gupta's primary success and the discrete success of Fordham on some cross-claim issues, and a gross sum costs order should be made for $45,000 net of GST to avoid protracted costs assessment.
Court Disposition
Defendant ordered to pay Plaintiff's costs, fixed sum
Orders
- Order the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings, including the cross-claim, fixed in the amount of $45,000 net of GST.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment