Agapis v Plumbers Licensing Board [2014] FCA 400
The appeal should be stayed and the hearing vacated due to the applicant's demonstrated incapacity, and the respondent's non-opposition to adjournment, pending resolution of the respondent's interlocutory application regarding vexatious proceedings.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Raoul Agapis; Respondent: Plumbers Licensing Board
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Application in Appellate Proceedings
- Outcome
- Appeal stayed and vacated; applications and directions timetabled; no mediation ordered at this stage.
- Legal Topics
- Application to Stay Appeal, Vexatious Proceedings Orders
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raoul Agapis
Applicant
Plumbers Licensing Board
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Application in Appellate Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal proceedings should be stayed due to the applicant's medical condition
- 2 Whether the respondent's application for a vexatious proceedings order should proceed
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal should be stayed and the hearing vacated due to the applicant's demonstrated incapacity, and the respondent's non-opposition to adjournment, pending resolution of the respondent's interlocutory application regarding vexatious proceedings.
Court Disposition
Appeal stayed and vacated; applications and directions timetabled; no mediation ordered at this stage.
Orders
- The appeal listed for 22 May 2014 is vacated.
- The appeal is to be re-listed for directions, if necessary, after determination of the respondent's interlocutory application dated 11 March 2014.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment