R v RAP [2001] NSWCCA 471
The evidence was open to the jury to find penetration beyond reasonable doubt, so the ground of unreasonable verdict failed; however, the sentence was imposed in error by failing to consider the harsher nature of strict/protective custody, warranting a less severe substituted sentence.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: RAP
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence From District Court
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave to appeal against sentence granted; sentence appeal allowed; sentence quashed and substituted.
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Against Sentence, Special Circumstances in Sentencing, Protective Custody, Manifest Excessiveness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
RAP
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence From District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for sexual intercourse with a child under 16 was unreasonable or unsupported by the evidence as to penetration
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive and/or failed to take into account the nature of custody
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence was open to the jury to find penetration beyond reasonable doubt, so the ground of unreasonable verdict failed; however, the sentence was imposed in error by failing to consider the harsher nature of strict/protective custody, warranting a less severe substituted sentence.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave to appeal against sentence granted; sentence appeal allowed; sentence quashed and substituted.
Orders
- Appeal against conviction dismissed
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment