R v JOW [2017] NSWDC 201
A sentence of imprisonment is the only appropriate penalty, the starting point of 8 years reduced by 25% due to an early guilty plea, resulting in a non-parole period of 3 years and a balance of term of 3 years, taking into account historic sentencing patterns, aggravating and mitigating features, offender's age and health, very low risk of reoffending, and special circumstances for parole ratio variation.
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Crown; Offender: JOW
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced to imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Historical Sexual Assault, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Prosecution
JOW
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for historical offence of rape
- 2 Application of sentencing patterns at time of offence
- 3 Aggravating and mitigating factors in sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
A sentence of imprisonment is the only appropriate penalty, the starting point of 8 years reduced by 25% due to an early guilty plea, resulting in a non-parole period of 3 years and a balance of term of 3 years, taking into account historic sentencing patterns, aggravating and mitigating features, offender's age and health, very low risk of reoffending, and special circumstances for parole ratio variation.
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced to imprisonment
Orders
- Convicted in relation to one count of rape.
- Sentence: non-parole period of 3 years from 21 June 2017 to 20 June 2020; balance of term of 3 years from 21 June 2020 to 20 June 2023.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment