Ghosh v Scott Newton trading as Shaw Gidley (No 9) [2024] NSWSC 740

Leave to file the proposed amended statement of claim was refused because the pleading was fundamentally defective—embarrassing, prolix, impenetrable, not disclosing any reasonable cause of action, and an abuse of process—warranting dismissal of the proceedings without leave to replead.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 13 June 2024
Procedural Posture: Civil / Application for Leave to File Amended Statement of Claim; Dismissal of Proceedings
Outcome: Leave to file amended statement of claim refused; proceedings dismissed with costs; no leave to replead.
Legal Topics: ['pleadings' 'amendment' 'abuse of Process' 'bankruptcy']

['civil Procedure' 'equity'] ['pleadings' 'amendment' 'abuse of Process' 'bankruptcy']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application for Leave to File Amended Statement of Claim; Dismissal of Proceedings

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether leave should be granted to file a proposed amended statement of claim' 'Whether the proposed amended statement of claim discloses any reasonable cause of action' 'Whether the proceeding constitutes an abuse of process']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Leave to file amended statement of claim refused; proceedings dismissed with costs; no leave to replead.

Orders

['Leave to file amended statement of claim refused' 'Amended notice of motion dismissed with costs' 'Proceedings dismissed with costs' 'No leave to replead']