Turini v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 822

Turini v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 822

Direction No. 17 was a valid exercise of the Minister's power under s 499, but the Tribunal erred in law by failing to take into account the likelihood of re-offending, a relevant consideration required by the Direction when assessing the protection of the Australian community. This constituted an error of law,...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 June 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
['visa Refusal on Character Grounds' 'ministerial Directions Under Migration Act' 'procedural Fairness' 'relevant Considerations in Administrative Decision Making']
['immigration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['visa Refusal on Character Grounds' 'ministerial Directions Under Migration Act' 'procedural Fairness' 'relevant Considerations in Administrative Decision Making']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Direction No. 17 issued under s 499 of the Migration Act 1958 is ultra vires or void in whole or in part' 'Whether the Tribunal erred in law in its interpretation or application of Direction No. 17' 'Whether procedural fairness was denied to the applicant' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to take into account relevant considerations, specifically the likelihood of re-offending']

Ratio Decidendi

Direction No. 17 was a valid exercise of the Minister's power under s 499, but the Tribunal erred in law by failing to take into account the likelihood of re-offending, a relevant consideration required by the Direction when assessing the protection of the Australian community. This constituted an error of law, warranting that the Tribunal's decision be set aside and remitted for reconsideration.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • ['The appeal is allowed.' 'The decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal given on 14 August 2000 is set aside.' "The application for review of the respondent's delegate's decision is remitted to be heard and decided again by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal." "The respondent pay the applicant's costs."]