Ray Fitz-Gibbon Architects Pty Limited v Ku-ring-gai Council [2004] NSWLEC 224
Compliance with numerical development standards may be departed from where the qualitative requirements for neighbourhood amenity and streetscape are met, and where a SEPP 1 objection is properly established, development consent should be granted despite minor exceedances involving the number of storeys and non-external garbage facility location.
- Parties
- Applicant: Ray Fitz-Gibbon Architects Pty Limited; Respondent: Ku-ring-gai Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld and development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Housing for Older People or People With a Disability, Neighbourhood Amenity, Streetscape, Environmental Planning Instruments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ray Fitz-Gibbon Architects Pty Limited
Applicant
Ku-ring-gai Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether adequate regard has been given to neighbourhood amenity and streetscape under SEPP 5
- 2 Impact of number of storeys and floor space ratio non-compliance
- 3 Public interest concerns
Ratio Decidendi
Compliance with numerical development standards may be departed from where the qualitative requirements for neighbourhood amenity and streetscape are met, and where a SEPP 1 objection is properly established, development consent should be granted despite minor exceedances involving the number of storeys and non-external garbage facility location.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld and development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development Application No. 1032/03 for the demolition of an existing residence and erection of a housing development for older people or people with a disability at 55 Pentecost Avenue, Pymble, is approved subject to conditions in Annexure A.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment