R v Richards; Ex parte Fitzpatrick and Browne [1955] HCA 36
Section 49 of the Constitution operates independently and confers on the Houses of Parliament all the privileges (including the privilege to judge and punish for contempt and the conclusiveness of Speaker's warrants) enjoyed by the House of Commons at the establishment of the Commonwealth, unless and until...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Respondent: The Queen; Respondent: Edward Richards; Applicant: Raymond Edward Fitzpatrick; Applicant: Frank Courtney Browne
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 1955
- Procedural Posture
- Habeas Corpus Application / Determination of Application on Reference to Full High Court
- Outcome
- Applications for writs of habeas corpus refused
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Power Under Constitution, Parliamentary Privilege to Punish for Contempt, Constitution S. 49 and S. 50, Enforcement of Parliamentary Privilege, Separation of Powers
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Respondent
Edward Richards
Respondent
Raymond Edward Fitzpatrick
Applicant
Frank Courtney Browne
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Habeas Corpus Application / Determination of Application on Reference to Full High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Parliament has power to judge and punish for contempt in the manner exercised in this case
- 2 Whether the Speaker's warrant for imprisonment is conclusive and precludes judicial examination
- 3 Whether s. 49 of the Constitution confers the full powers of the House of Commons, including power to judge and punish contempts, on Houses of Federal Parliament
Ratio Decidendi
Section 49 of the Constitution operates independently and confers on the Houses of Parliament all the privileges (including the privilege to judge and punish for contempt and the conclusiveness of Speaker's warrants) enjoyed by the House of Commons at the establishment of the Commonwealth, unless and until Parliament otherwise declares. The general structure or separation of powers principles do not justify a restrictive construction of s. 49. The warrants for Fitzpatrick and Browne are sufficient and conclusive; the courts cannot go behind them.
Court Disposition
Applications for writs of habeas corpus refused
Orders
- Applications for habeas corpus refused
- No order for release; applicants to remain in custody as committed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment