R v Rosevear [1999] NSWSC 732
The applicant was eligible to apply and, despite the brutal and merciless circumstances of the murder and the absence of mitigating circumstances, his favourable custodial record, nil misconduct, work history, participation in programs, rehabilitation prospects, and the utility of further rehabilitative planning justified determining a minimum term and additional term. An appropriate sentence was a minimum term of fifteen years penal servitude from 16 January 1989 to 15 January 2004 and an additional term of five years from 16 January 2004 to 15 January 2009, with parole eligibility from 16 January 2004.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application Pursuant to S 13 a of the Sentencing Act / Determination of a Minimum Term and an Additional Term for an Existing Life Sentence
- Outcome
- Application granted; minimum term and additional term determined.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'life Sentence' 'minimum Term' 'additional Term' 'parole Eligibility' 'rehabilitation' 'victim Impact Statement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Pursuant to S 13 a of the Sentencing Act / Determination of a Minimum Term and an Additional Term for an Existing Life Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court should determine a minimum term and an additional term for the applicant's existing life sentence under s 13A of the Sentencing Act." "What minimum term and additional term were appropriate having regard to the circumstances of the murder, the applicant's other convictions, post-sentence conduct and rehabilitation, community safety, age, and other relevant sentencing considerations."]
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was eligible to apply and, despite the brutal and merciless circumstances of the murder and the absence of mitigating circumstances, his favourable custodial record, nil misconduct, work history, participation in programs, rehabilitation prospects, and the utility of further rehabilitative planning justified determining a minimum term and additional term. An appropriate sentence was a minimum term of fifteen years penal servitude from 16 January 1989 to 15 January 2004 and an additional term of five years from 16 January 2004 to 15 January 2009, with parole eligibility from 16 January 2004.
Court Disposition
Application granted; minimum term and additional term determined.
Orders
- ['Minimum term of fifteen years penal servitude to date from 16 January 1989 and to expire on 15 January 2004.' 'Additional term of five years to date from 16 January 2004 and to expire on 15 January 2009.' '16 January 2004 specified as the first date upon which the applicant is to be eligible for release on parole.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment