DELFINO, Raymond Joseph v R [2008] NSWCCA 18

DELFINO, Raymond Joseph v R [2008] NSWCCA 18

The difference in sentence imposed on the applicant compared to co-offenders was justified by the applicant's prior criminal history and different subjective circumstances. The sentencing judge did not err in applying the parity principle, assessing the applicant's motivation, or considering the applicant's criminal...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 February 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal – Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal against sentence dismissed.
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'prior Criminal History' 'parity in Sentencing']
['criminal Law'] ['sentencing' 'prior Criminal History' 'parity in Sentencing']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal – Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in applying or failing to apply the parity principle' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred in finding that the applicant had involved himself in the cultivation for monetary gain' "Whether the sentencing judge erred in significance given to the applicant's prior criminal history" 'Whether the sentence is manifestly excessive']

Ratio Decidendi

The difference in sentence imposed on the applicant compared to co-offenders was justified by the applicant's prior criminal history and different subjective circumstances. The sentencing judge did not err in applying the parity principle, assessing the applicant's motivation, or considering the applicant's criminal history. The sentence was within the proper range of sentencing discretion.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal against sentence dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal against sentence granted' 'Appeal against sentence dismissed']