DELFINO, Raymond Joseph v R [2008] NSWCCA 18
The difference in sentence imposed on the applicant compared to co-offenders was justified by the applicant's prior criminal history and different subjective circumstances. The sentencing judge did not err in applying the parity principle, assessing the applicant's motivation, or considering the applicant's criminal...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal – Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal against sentence dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'prior Criminal History' 'parity in Sentencing']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal – Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in applying or failing to apply the parity principle' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred in finding that the applicant had involved himself in the cultivation for monetary gain' "Whether the sentencing judge erred in significance given to the applicant's prior criminal history" 'Whether the sentence is manifestly excessive']
Ratio Decidendi
The difference in sentence imposed on the applicant compared to co-offenders was justified by the applicant's prior criminal history and different subjective circumstances. The sentencing judge did not err in applying the parity principle, assessing the applicant's motivation, or considering the applicant's criminal history. The sentence was within the proper range of sentencing discretion.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal against sentence dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence granted' 'Appeal against sentence dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment