King v R [2010] NSWCCA 33

King v R [2010] NSWCCA 33

The sentencing judge did not materially increase the applicant's sentence by treating substantial emotional harm as an aggravating feature; and the applicant's sentence is not too severe compared to co-offenders given differences in criminal records, subjective circumstances, and criminality.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 March 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal; Decision on Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Extension of time and leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['aggravated Sexual Assault' 'sentencing Principles' 'aggravating and Mitigating Factors' 'parity of Sentencing']
['criminal Law'] ['aggravated Sexual Assault' 'sentencing Principles' 'aggravating and Mitigating Factors' 'parity of Sentencing']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal; Decision on Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether sentencing judge erred by treating substantial emotional harm as an aggravating factor' "Whether applicant's sentence lacks parity with co-offender's sentence"]

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge did not materially increase the applicant's sentence by treating substantial emotional harm as an aggravating feature; and the applicant's sentence is not too severe compared to co-offenders given differences in criminal records, subjective circumstances, and criminality.

Court Disposition

Extension of time and leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Extension of time granted for leave to appeal.' 'Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']