R&B Investments Pty Ltd (Trustee) v Blue Sky Alternative Investments Limited (in liq) (Adoption of Referee's Report) [2024] FCA 1083
The applicants failed to demonstrate manifest error or any error of principle in the referee’s report; the report was fairly and reasonably arrived at and should be adopted. The alleged errors were not substantiated and the referee's reasoning was sound in excluding costs relating to unnecessary or premature work.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: R&B Investments Pty Ltd as Trustee for the R&B Pension Fund; Applicant: David Furniss; First Respondent: Blue Sky Alternative Investments Limited ACN 136 866 236 (Administrators Appointed) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (in liquidation); Second Respondent: Robert Warner Shand; Third Respondent: John Bruce Kain; Fourth Respondent: Ernst & Young (A Firm) ABN 75 288 172 749; Fifth Respondent: Chubb Insurance Australia Limited ACN 001 642 020; Sixth Respondent: DUAL Australia Pty Ltd ACN 107 553 257 On Behalf Of Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's; Seventh Respondent: Zurich Australian Insurance Limited ACN 000 296 640; Eighth Respondent: XL Insurance Company SE ARBN 083 570 441; Costs Applicants / Former Respondents: Former Third, Fourth and Tenth Respondents (including Mr Wilson, Mr Dignam, Ms Stead)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Representative Proceedings / Post Discontinuance, Application to Adopt/vary Referee's Report on Costs
- Outcome
- Adoption of referee's report; specific order for payment of costs.
- Legal Topics
- Costs in Representative Proceedings, Referee's Reports, Adoption of Report, Varying Reports, Lump Sum Costs
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R&B Investments Pty Ltd as Trustee for the R&B Pension Fund
Applicant
David Furniss
Applicant
Blue Sky Alternative Investments Limited ACN 136 866 236 (Administrators Appointed) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (in liquidation)
First Respondent
Robert Warner Shand
Second Respondent
John Bruce Kain
Third Respondent
Ernst & Young (A Firm) ABN 75 288 172 749
Fourth Respondent
Chubb Insurance Australia Limited ACN 001 642 020
Fifth Respondent
DUAL Australia Pty Ltd ACN 107 553 257 On Behalf Of Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's
Sixth Respondent
Zurich Australian Insurance Limited ACN 000 296 640
Seventh Respondent
XL Insurance Company SE ARBN 083 570 441
Eighth Respondent
Former Third, Fourth and Tenth Respondents (including Mr Wilson, Mr Dignam, Ms Stead)
Costs Applicants / Former Respondents
Procedural Posture
Representative Proceedings / Post Discontinuance, Application to Adopt/vary Referee's Report on Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the report of the costs referee should be adopted or varied
- 2 Whether the referee made fundamental errors in assessment of costs
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants failed to demonstrate manifest error or any error of principle in the referee’s report; the report was fairly and reasonably arrived at and should be adopted. The alleged errors were not substantiated and the referee's reasoning was sound in excluding costs relating to unnecessary or premature work.
Court Disposition
Adoption of referee's report; specific order for payment of costs.
Orders
- The report of the Costs Referee dated 21 November 2023 be adopted by the Court.
- R&B Investments pay the costs of the former third, fourth and tenth respondents in the amount of $88,258.16.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment