RD Miller Pty Ltd v Roads and Maritime Services NSW [2020] NSWCA 241
Compensation for loss of access under s 69 of the Roads Act 1993 (NSW) must be assessed by reference to the legal restriction imposed when a Ministerial order declares a road to be a controlled access road and restricts access, not by reference to earlier physical works or steps. The Pointe Gourde principle and similar common law concepts are not incorporated into the Roads Act. The amount is fixed as the difference between market value immediately before and after the legal restriction. Prior decreases in land value by works are not disregarded unless the statute so prescribes.
- Parties
- Appellant: RD Miller Pty Ltd; Respondent: Roads and Maritime Services NSW
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Compensation for Loss of Access, Interpretation of Roads Act 1993 (nsw), Pointe Gourde Principle, Controlled Access Road Declarations, Assessment of Market Value
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RD Miller Pty Ltd
Appellant
Roads and Maritime Services NSW
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether compensation under s 69 of the Roads Act 1993 (NSW) is to be assessed by disregarding decreases in land value caused by works prior to declaration.
- 2 Whether the phrase "as a result of the road becoming" a controlled access road in s 68(1) refers to a process or only the Minister's declaration.
- 3 Whether common law concepts such as the Pointe Gourde principle apply to compensation assessment under Div 4 of Pt 5 of the Roads Act.
Ratio Decidendi
Compensation for loss of access under s 69 of the Roads Act 1993 (NSW) must be assessed by reference to the legal restriction imposed when a Ministerial order declares a road to be a controlled access road and restricts access, not by reference to earlier physical works or steps. The Pointe Gourde principle and similar common law concepts are not incorporated into the Roads Act. The amount is fixed as the difference between market value immediately before and after the legal restriction. Prior decreases in land value by works are not disregarded unless the statute so prescribes.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted against decisions and orders of Robson J and Duggan J.
- Appeal against said decisions and orders dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment