Re Trade Mark <Thunderbird< [1974] HCA 51
The application for rectification was filed within seven years of registration, and service and hearing beyond seven years did not preclude the application; the mark was not validly registered as there was insufficient evidence of use or distinctiveness in Australia before registration.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 1974
- Procedural Posture
- Rectification of Register / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed; mark expunged from register.
- Legal Topics
- ['trade Marks' 'rectification of Register' 'expunging Mark']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Rectification of Register / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the entry of the trade mark 'Thunderbird' was wrongly made in the register" 'Whether there was user in Australia of the mark before application for registration' 'Whether the applicant for registration was the author of the mark in Australia' 'Whether an applicant for expunging had used the mark in Australia indicating a connexion between the mark and goods' 'Whether the knowledge acquired by a single importer is sufficient for distinctiveness in Australia' 'Effect of validation of a mark seven years after registration when proceedings commenced within seven years but heard after']
Ratio Decidendi
The application for rectification was filed within seven years of registration, and service and hearing beyond seven years did not preclude the application; the mark was not validly registered as there was insufficient evidence of use or distinctiveness in Australia before registration.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; mark expunged from register.
Orders
- ["The trade mark 'Thunderbird' be expunged from the register."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment