Farrell v Super Retail Group Limited (Adjournment Application) [2024] FCA 1473

Farrell v Super Retail Group Limited (Adjournment Application) [2024] FCA 1473

The interests of justice and the overarching purpose of the Federal Court of Australia Act require refusal of the adjournment: the withdrawal of senior counsel does not prevent effective representation by junior counsel sufficiently familiar with the matter, and granting an adjournment would cause disproportionate delay and prejudice without sufficient justification.

Parties
Applicant: Rebecca Farrell; First Respondent: Super Retail Group Limited; Second Respondent: Anthony Heraghty; Third Respondent: Kevin Figueiredo; Fourth Respondent: Sally Pitkin; Fifth Respondent: Annabelle Chaplain; Sixth Respondent: Amelia Berczelly; Interested Person: Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 December 2024
Procedural Posture
Adjournment Application (practice and Procedure) in a Specific Performance Claim / Interlocutory Application for Adjournment During Trial (hearing Part Heard, Day Three)
Outcome
Adjournment application refused
Legal Topics
Adjournment of Hearing, Withdrawal of Counsel, Legal Professional Privilege, Specific Performance, Overarching Purpose (pt VB Federal Court of Australia Act)
Practice and Procedure Employment Law Adjournment of Hearing Withdrawal of Counsel Legal Professional Privilege Specific Performance Overarching Purpose (pt VB Federal Court of Australia Act)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rebecca Farrell

Applicant

Super Retail Group Limited

First Respondent

Anthony Heraghty

Second Respondent

Kevin Figueiredo

Third Respondent

Sally Pitkin

Fourth Respondent

Annabelle Chaplain

Fifth Respondent

Amelia Berczelly

Sixth Respondent

Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited

Interested Person

Procedural Posture

Adjournment Application (practice and Procedure) in a Specific Performance Claim / Interlocutory Application for Adjournment During Trial (hearing Part Heard, Day Three)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Should the applicant's application for adjournment of the hearing be granted where senior counsel for the applicant seeks to withdraw?
  2. 2 Would refusal to adjourn cause prejudice to the applicant?
  3. 3 Can junior counsel adequately represent the applicant given the circumstances?

Ratio Decidendi

The interests of justice and the overarching purpose of the Federal Court of Australia Act require refusal of the adjournment: the withdrawal of senior counsel does not prevent effective representation by junior counsel sufficiently familiar with the matter, and granting an adjournment would cause disproportionate delay and prejudice without sufficient justification.

Court Disposition

Adjournment application refused

Orders

  • The applicant's application for an adjournment of the hearing be refused.