Ye v Chen [2022] NSWCA 219

Ye v Chen [2022] NSWCA 219

Ms Ye signed the handwritten document as "Rebecca Ye" without qualification and without any reference to the Company, despite having written and composed it herself and having the opportunity to limit her liability. The surrounding circumstances, including repeated demands for proof of lodgement or refund, supported the conclusion that the document added Ms Ye's personal obligation to ensure the refund occurred. The opening words requesting time until 31 January 2018 constituted a request for forbearance, and Ms Chen's forbearance during that period was consideration for the promise. The proposed appeal therefore lacked merit.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 November 2022
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Application for Leave to Appeal From a Supreme Court Common Law Division Judgment Dismissing an Appeal From the Local Court
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['construction of Handwritten Document Promising Refund of Deposit' 'whether Signatory Assumed Personal Liability or Signed as Company Director' 'consideration by Forbearance to Sue' 'leave to Appeal']
['contracts' 'agency' 'guarantees' 'civil Procedure'] ['construction of Handwritten Document Promising Refund of Deposit' 'whether Signatory Assumed Personal Liability or Signed as Company Director' 'consideration by Forbearance to Sue' 'leave to Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Application for Leave to Appeal From a Supreme Court Common Law Division Judgment Dismissing an Appeal From the Local Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the handwritten document dated 17 December 2017 imposed a personal obligation on Ms Ye to ensure the refund of fees if no evidence of the visa application was provided by 31 January 2018.' "Whether there was consideration for Ms Ye's promise in the form of forbearance to sue." 'What surrounding circumstances could be used in construing the handwritten document.']

Ratio Decidendi

Ms Ye signed the handwritten document as "Rebecca Ye" without qualification and without any reference to the Company, despite having written and composed it herself and having the opportunity to limit her liability. The surrounding circumstances, including repeated demands for proof of lodgement or refund, supported the conclusion that the document added Ms Ye's personal obligation to ensure the refund occurred. The opening words requesting time until 31 January 2018 constituted a request for forbearance, and Ms Chen's forbearance during that period was consideration for the promise. The proposed appeal therefore lacked merit.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.']