Richardson v Oracle Corporation Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCAFC 139
The offer of compromise complied with procedural requirements, and none of the circumstances presented, including unforeseen development of damages jurisprudence, constituted exceptional reasons to displace the presumptive entitlement to indemnity costs. The appellant therefore remains entitled to pre-judgment interest and indemnity costs from the date of the offer.
- Parties
- Appellant: Rebecca Richardson; First Respondent: Oracle Corporation Australia Pty Ltd (ACN 003 074 468); Second Respondent: Randol Tucker
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Costs Determination Following Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- Appellant awarded pre-judgment interest and indemnity costs from 21 September 2010; quantum of damages amended.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Offers of Compromise, Pre Judgment Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rebecca Richardson
Appellant
Oracle Corporation Australia Pty Ltd (ACN 003 074 468)
First Respondent
Randol Tucker
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Determination Following Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to pre-judgment interest on the damages award
- 2 Whether the appellant is entitled to indemnity costs on the basis of an offer of compromise
Ratio Decidendi
The offer of compromise complied with procedural requirements, and none of the circumstances presented, including unforeseen development of damages jurisprudence, constituted exceptional reasons to displace the presumptive entitlement to indemnity costs. The appellant therefore remains entitled to pre-judgment interest and indemnity costs from the date of the offer.
Court Disposition
Appellant awarded pre-judgment interest and indemnity costs from 21 September 2010; quantum of damages amended.
Orders
- Order (2)(b) of the orders made on 15 July 2014 varied by substituting $161,572.24 for $130,000.
- The issue of the offer of compromise governed by the Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment