R v Nicholas Murray Read [2018] NSWDC 304
Given the offender's course of conduct involving drug-fueled violence and attempts to pervert justice, with early guilty pleas, previous criminal history, and the need for both deterrence and opportunity for rehabilitation, an aggregate sentence reflecting total criminality of 3 years 6 months imprisonment (with non-parole period of 2 years 3 months), commencing 8 January 2017, is appropriate under s 53A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1986 and guided by principles of general deterrence, denunciation, and proportionality.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Crown; Offender: Nicholas Murray Read
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Legal Topics
- Reckless Wounding, Intent to Pervert the Course of Justice, Sentencing, Discount for Guilty Plea, Aggregate Sentencing, Rehabilitation, Drug Addiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Crown
Prosecutor
Nicholas Murray Read
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for reckless wounding
- 2 Appropriate sentence for acts intended to pervert the course of justice
- 3 Effect of guilty plea on sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
Given the offender's course of conduct involving drug-fueled violence and attempts to pervert justice, with early guilty pleas, previous criminal history, and the need for both deterrence and opportunity for rehabilitation, an aggregate sentence reflecting total criminality of 3 years 6 months imprisonment (with non-parole period of 2 years 3 months), commencing 8 January 2017, is appropriate under s 53A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1986 and guided by principles of general deterrence, denunciation, and proportionality.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment