Lowe v Pascoe (No 3) [2012] NSWSC 907
The application failed because the challenged statement was made about a matter not then in issue, was based on a then non-contentious assertion that the journals were predominantly in Mrs Lowe's handwriting, did not amount to a finding as to Mrs Lowe's credit, and did not involve a concluded view on an essential issue. A fair-minded lay observer would not conclude that there was a reasonable apprehension that the judge might not be able to bring a free mind to the fresh trial.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application That Judge Recuse Himself / Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['recusal' 'reasonable Apprehension of Bias' 'fair Minded Lay Observer' 'interlocutory Applications']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application That Judge Recuse Himself / Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the statement in Lowe v Pascoe (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 885 that the cash payments journals were predominantly in Mrs Lowe's handwriting gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias." 'Whether a fair-minded lay observer would conclude that the judge might not be able to bring a free mind to bear on the evidence and submissions in the fresh trial.']
Ratio Decidendi
The application failed because the challenged statement was made about a matter not then in issue, was based on a then non-contentious assertion that the journals were predominantly in Mrs Lowe's handwriting, did not amount to a finding as to Mrs Lowe's credit, and did not involve a concluded view on an essential issue. A fair-minded lay observer would not conclude that there was a reasonable apprehension that the judge might not be able to bring a free mind to the fresh trial.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- ['Application dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment