Patel v Redmyre Group Pty Limited [2021] NSWCATAP 351

Patel v Redmyre Group Pty Limited [2021] NSWCATAP 351

Leave to appeal is refused because the Appellants have not established that the decision to award a single global costs order was unfair or inequitable; the Tribunal correctly applied Rule 38 and usual principles for awarding costs, and absence of denial of procedural fairness or significant error means no...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 November 2021
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal—costs Decision
Outcome
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['costs' 'appeal' 'consumer and Commercial Division']
['civil Procedure'] ['costs' 'appeal' 'consumer and Commercial Division']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Leave to Appeal—costs Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted against costs order on grounds decision was not fair and equitable']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal is refused because the Appellants have not established that the decision to award a single global costs order was unfair or inequitable; the Tribunal correctly applied Rule 38 and usual principles for awarding costs, and absence of denial of procedural fairness or significant error means no substantial miscarriage of justice is shown.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal is refused.' 'Appeal dismissed.']