Woodgate v R [2009] NSWCCA 137
The sentencing judge did not err by rejecting untested psychological opinion and submissions unsupported by evidence; the sentence was not manifestly excessive in light of the quantity of MDMA involved, the applicant's culpability, and statutory benchmarks; parity with the co-offender was appropriately considered given the markedly lesser charge facing the co-offender; and the modest adjustment for special circumstances was within the judge's discretion.
- Parties
- Applicant: Rees Woodgate; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Supply of Prohibited Drug, Parity, Special Circumstances, Non Parole Period, Maximum Penalty, Manifestly Excessive Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rees Woodgate
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the judge erred in rejecting submitted evidence including psychologist's opinion
- 3 Whether the judge correctly applied principles of parity between co-offenders
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge did not err by rejecting untested psychological opinion and submissions unsupported by evidence; the sentence was not manifestly excessive in light of the quantity of MDMA involved, the applicant's culpability, and statutory benchmarks; parity with the co-offender was appropriately considered given the markedly lesser charge facing the co-offender; and the modest adjustment for special circumstances was within the judge's discretion.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal against sentence granted.
- Appeal against sentence dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment