Regina v Simon DAHER Regina v Tod TOCHEL [2004] NSWCCA 458
The District Court judge's stated view was only an advisory indication of how he would decide if the case proceeded on the evidence tendered, and was not a judgment or order for the purposes of s5F of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912; accordingly the applications were incompetent.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Application / Application for Extension of Time Within Which to Appeal Under S5 F Criminal Appeal Act Against an Alleged Interlocutory Judgment or Order of the District Court
- Outcome
- Applications dismissed. Matters remitted to the District Court.
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Appeals' 'advisory Opinions' 'drug Manufacture' 'commercial Quantity of Prohibited Drug']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Application / Application for Extension of Time Within Which to Appeal Under S5 F Criminal Appeal Act Against an Alleged Interlocutory Judgment or Order of the District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the District Court judge's opinion was a judgment or order for the purposes of s5F of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912." 'Whether the applications for extension of time to appeal under s5F were competent.']
Ratio Decidendi
The District Court judge's stated view was only an advisory indication of how he would decide if the case proceeded on the evidence tendered, and was not a judgment or order for the purposes of s5F of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912; accordingly the applications were incompetent.
Court Disposition
Applications dismissed. Matters remitted to the District Court.
Orders
- ['Applications dismissed.' 'Matters remitted to the District Court.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment