Regina v Vi Cuong Tu [1999] NSWCCA 357
Having regard to the applicant's role as no more than a minder, his subjective circumstances, and the need for a greater s 16G reduction, the original sentence was too severe; the appropriate head sentence was six years with a non-parole period of four years.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 October 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal Against Sentence in the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted; appeal against sentence allowed; sentences imposed below quashed; sentence reduced to six years imprisonment with a non-parole period of four years.
- Legal Topics
- ['possession of Heroin' 'excessive Sentence' 'section 16 G Reduction' 'non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal Against Sentence in the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed in the District Court for possession of heroin was too severe.' "Whether the sentencing judge's starting point was too high." 'Whether the reduction under s 16G of the Crimes Act 1914 (Commonwealth) should have been greater.']
Ratio Decidendi
Having regard to the applicant's role as no more than a minder, his subjective circumstances, and the need for a greater s 16G reduction, the original sentence was too severe; the appropriate head sentence was six years with a non-parole period of four years.
Court Disposition
Application granted; appeal against sentence allowed; sentences imposed below quashed; sentence reduced to six years imprisonment with a non-parole period of four years.
Orders
- ['Application is granted.' 'The appeal against sentence is allowed.' 'The sentences imposed below are quashed.' 'The term of imprisonment be six years commencing 21 March 1997 and expiring on 20 March 2003.' 'The non-parole period be four years commencing on 21 March 1997 and expiring on 20 March 2001.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment