Regina v Jason Shiagetz [2003] NSWCCA 115

Regina v Jason Shiagetz [2003] NSWCCA 115

The conviction was upheld because the jury was properly entitled to accept the evidence of the Crown witnesses over the appellant's account and there was no demonstrated miscarriage of justice or ground requiring intervention. The sentence was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness of the offence and the applicant's circumstances.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 May 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave granted to appeal against sentence; appeal against sentence dismissed.
Legal Topics
['robbery in Company' 'robbery' 'appeal Against Conviction' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'sentencing']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

  1. 1 ['Whether the conviction for robbery in company should be set aside on the basis that the jury could not have properly been satisfied of guilt beyond reasonable doubt' 'Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive']

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction was upheld because the jury was properly entitled to accept the evidence of the Crown witnesses over the appellant's account and there was no demonstrated miscarriage of justice or ground requiring intervention. The sentence was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness of the offence and the applicant's circumstances.

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave granted to appeal against sentence; appeal against sentence dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The appeal against conviction be dismissed.' 'Leave be granted to appeal against sentence.' 'The appeal against sentence be dismissed.']