R v Newson (No 1) [2021] NSWSC 442

R v Newson (No 1) [2021] NSWSC 442

Witness A's evidence of jealousy- and possessiveness-driven aggressive and controlling behaviour by the accused in an intimate relationship closely resembles the conduct alleged in connection with the deceased, particularly in terms of non-physical manifestations of control and aggression. This evidence is relevant to proof of motive and intent and possesses significant probative value, which substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect, thereby meeting the threshold for admission as tendency evidence under ss 97 and 101 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 April 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial Evidentiary Ruling
Outcome
Grant leave
Legal Topics
['tendency Evidence' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'probative Value' 'section 97 Evidence Act 1995 (nsw)']
['criminal Law' 'evidence'] ['tendency Evidence' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'probative Value' 'section 97 Evidence Act 1995 (nsw)']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Pre Trial Evidentiary Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether evidence of Witness A is admissible as tendency evidence against the accused' 'Whether the probative value of the tendency evidence substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect under s 101(2) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)']

Ratio Decidendi

Witness A's evidence of jealousy- and possessiveness-driven aggressive and controlling behaviour by the accused in an intimate relationship closely resembles the conduct alleged in connection with the deceased, particularly in terms of non-physical manifestations of control and aggression. This evidence is relevant to proof of motive and intent and possesses significant probative value, which substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect, thereby meeting the threshold for admission as tendency evidence under ss 97 and 101 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).

Court Disposition

Grant leave

Orders

  • ['Grant leave to the Crown to lead evidence of Witness A as tendency evidence in its case against the accused.']