Regina v El Hassan [2003] NSWCCA 139
The evidence supported that the offender was involved in an attempt to possess a commercial quantity of cocaine with knowledge and intent, playing a critical albeit limited role in an organised enterprise. The initial sentence imposed was manifestly inadequate given the seriousness and offender's role, justifying its increase on Crown appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Crown Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction dismissed; Crown appeal against sentence allowed; original sentence quashed; new sentence imposed.
- Legal Topics
- ['attempting to Possess Cocaine' 'prohibited Import' 'sentencing' 'joint Criminal Enterprise' 'parity and Proportionality in Sentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Crown Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether offender attempted to possess not less than the commercial quantity of cocaine' 'Whether sentence imposed was manifestly inadequate' 'Degree of involvement of offender in the offence' 'Application of parity and proportionality in sentencing']
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence supported that the offender was involved in an attempt to possess a commercial quantity of cocaine with knowledge and intent, playing a critical albeit limited role in an organised enterprise. The initial sentence imposed was manifestly inadequate given the seriousness and offender's role, justifying its increase on Crown appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction dismissed; Crown appeal against sentence allowed; original sentence quashed; new sentence imposed.
Orders
- ['Appeal against conviction dismissed.' 'Crown appeal against sentence allowed; sentence quashed.' 'In lieu, Radwin El Hassan is sentenced to imprisonment for 9 years 7 months commencing on 2 August 2002 with a non-parole period of 5 years 7 months expiring on 1 March 2008.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment