Regina v Lam [2002] NSWCCA 190

Regina v Lam [2002] NSWCCA 190

The sentencing judge did not err in principle by taking the Proceeds of Crime offences into account rather than imposing a separate sentence, and while the head sentence may have been lenient, it was not manifestly inadequate or outside the permissible range warranting appellate intervention.

Parties
Appellant: Regina (Cth); Respondent: Sik Lam
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 May 2002
Procedural Posture
Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Crown Appeals, Drug Offences, Proceeds of Crime
Criminal Law Sentencing Crown Appeals Drug Offences Proceeds of Crime

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina (Cth)

Appellant

Sik Lam

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in the exercise of sentencing discretion
  2. 2 Whether the respondent was wrongly sentenced separately for offences under the Proceeds of Crime Act instead of those offences being taken into account in sentencing for the principal drug offence
  3. 3 Whether the imposed sentence was manifestly inadequate and warranted appellate intervention

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge did not err in principle by taking the Proceeds of Crime offences into account rather than imposing a separate sentence, and while the head sentence may have been lenient, it was not manifestly inadequate or outside the permissible range warranting appellate intervention.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.