R v Achilles MEZZADRI [2011] NSWCCA 125
Given the objective and subjective features of the offence and the offender, the sentence imposed (including suspension) was within the discretion of the sentencing judge and was not manifestly inadequate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Sentence Appeal / Appeal From District Court to Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['firearm Offences' 'sentencing' 'non Parole Periods' 'suspended Sentences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Sentence Appeal / Appeal From District Court to Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Relevance of general deterrence to sentencing in firearm offences' 'Significance of the inoperability of firearms to objective seriousness of offence' 'Whether additional reasons are required for departing from standard non-parole period under Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999' 'Appropriateness of suspending sentence for serious firearm offences']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the objective and subjective features of the offence and the offender, the sentence imposed (including suspension) was within the discretion of the sentencing judge and was not manifestly inadequate.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment