REGINA v HICKEY [2003] NSWCCA 344
The sentences on Counts 2 and 3 were manifestly and appellably inadequate given the gravity of the offences, the concurrent nature of sentences, aggravating circumstances including previous convictions and offences committed while on bond. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the sentences on Counts 2 and 3, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Crown Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'appeal' 'break, Enter and Steal' 'escape From Lawful Custody']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Crown Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentences imposed on Counts 2 and 3 were manifestly inadequate' 'Appropriate sentencing for multiple offences including aggravating factors']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences on Counts 2 and 3 were manifestly and appellably inadequate given the gravity of the offences, the concurrent nature of sentences, aggravating circumstances including previous convictions and offences committed while on bond. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the sentences on Counts 2 and 3, and imposed new sentences to ensure appropriate custodial and non-parole periods.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- ['The Court sets aside the sentences on Counts 2 and 3.' 'Re-sentences the prisoner to imprisonment for two years to commence on 25 November 2003 and expire on 24 November 2005.' 'Non-parole period of six months to commence on 25 November 2003 and expire on 24 May 2004.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment