R v Pera [1999] NSWCCA 348
The trial should be stayed to preserve the Crown's statutory right to appeal under s5F Criminal Appeal Act and prevent the appeal from becoming nugatory.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Interlocutory Motion for Stay Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- stay granted
- Legal Topics
- ['evidentiary Rulings' 'appeal Under S5 F Criminal Appeal Act' 'stay of Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Interlocutory Motion for Stay Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the trial should be stayed pending determination of the Crown's appeal under s5F Criminal Appeal Act" 'Entitlement of the Crown to appeal under s5F Criminal Appeal Act']
Ratio Decidendi
The trial should be stayed to preserve the Crown's statutory right to appeal under s5F Criminal Appeal Act and prevent the appeal from becoming nugatory.
Court Disposition
stay granted
Orders
- ['Notice of Motion returnable instanter.' "The trial of the Respondent, listed to commence before Judge Keleman SC of the District Court, Campbelltown at 10.00am on 6 September 1999, be stayed until this Court has heard and determined the Appellant's application under section 5F of the Criminal Appeal Act, 1912."...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment