Regina v Fabrizio Calderoni [2000] NSWCCA 511
Although the sentencing judge erred in considering unwitting assistance as cooperation under section 23, the sentence imposed (two years’ imprisonment fully suspended) was within the permissible range, not appellably lenient, and appellate discretion should be exercised in favour of the respondent given strong subjective circumstances, notably rehabilitation.
- Parties
- Appellant: Regina; Respondent: Fabrizio Calderoni
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Crown appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Robbery in Company, Sentencing, Suspended Sentence, Crown Appeals Against Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Appellant
Fabrizio Calderoni
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether unwitting assistance to authorities entitles an offender to a sentencing discount under s 23 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed—suspension of a two-year sentence of imprisonment—was manifestly or appellably lenient
Ratio Decidendi
Although the sentencing judge erred in considering unwitting assistance as cooperation under section 23, the sentence imposed (two years’ imprisonment fully suspended) was within the permissible range, not appellably lenient, and appellate discretion should be exercised in favour of the respondent given strong subjective circumstances, notably rehabilitation.
Court Disposition
Crown appeal dismissed
Orders
- The Crown appeal against sentence is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment