R v GSH [2009] NSWCCA 67
Application for adjournment should succeed to avoid differently constituted benches dealing with connected issues; practical to await outcome of respondent's legal aid application regarding possible conviction appeal. No prejudice identified.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Hearing Vacated Pending Possible Conviction Appeal
- Outcome
- Hearing vacated and matter to be relisted for directions.
- Legal Topics
- ['crown Appeal Against Sentence' 'appeal Against Conviction Contemplated' 'delay Regarding Legal Aid' 'desirability of Same Bench Hearing All Issues']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Hearing Vacated Pending Possible Conviction Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether hearing of Crown appeal against sentence should proceed where respondent is contemplating appeal against conviction and awaiting legal aid decision']
Ratio Decidendi
Application for adjournment should succeed to avoid differently constituted benches dealing with connected issues; practical to await outcome of respondent's legal aid application regarding possible conviction appeal. No prejudice identified.
Court Disposition
Hearing vacated and matter to be relisted for directions.
Orders
- ['The hearing today is vacated.' "The matter is directed to be placed in the Registrar's next call-over list for further directions."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment