R v Smith, Jarad [2016] NSWCCA 75
The Crown failed to establish manifest inadequacy. The aggregate sentence imposed, considering all relevant objective and subjective circumstances, is within the acceptable range, confirmed by statistics and comparable cases. No error or unjust reasoning was demonstrated warranting appellate intervention.
- Parties
- Appellant: Regina; Respondent: Jarad Michael Smith
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Appellate Decision
- Outcome
- Crown appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Crown Appeal Against Sentence, Aggravated Dangerous Driving Occasioning Death, Manifestly Inadequate Sentence, General Deterrence, Sentencing Discretion, Guideline Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Appellant
Jarad Michael Smith
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Appellate Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence for aggravated dangerous driving occasioning death was manifestly inadequate
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in the assessment of general deterrence
- 3 Whether subjective circumstances were unduly considered
Ratio Decidendi
The Crown failed to establish manifest inadequacy. The aggregate sentence imposed, considering all relevant objective and subjective circumstances, is within the acceptable range, confirmed by statistics and comparable cases. No error or unjust reasoning was demonstrated warranting appellate intervention.
Court Disposition
Crown appeal dismissed
Orders
- Crown appeal dismissed; no variation to the sentence imposed by the District Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment