R v Smith, Jarad [2016] NSWCCA 75

R v Smith, Jarad [2016] NSWCCA 75

The Crown failed to establish manifest inadequacy. The aggregate sentence imposed, considering all relevant objective and subjective circumstances, is within the acceptable range, confirmed by statistics and comparable cases. No error or unjust reasoning was demonstrated warranting appellate intervention.

Parties
Appellant: Regina; Respondent: Jarad Michael Smith
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 April 2016
Procedural Posture
Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Appellate Decision
Outcome
Crown appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Crown Appeal Against Sentence, Aggravated Dangerous Driving Occasioning Death, Manifestly Inadequate Sentence, General Deterrence, Sentencing Discretion, Guideline Judgment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 28 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Appellant

Jarad Michael Smith

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Appellate Decision

  1. 1 Whether the sentence for aggravated dangerous driving occasioning death was manifestly inadequate
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in the assessment of general deterrence
  3. 3 Whether subjective circumstances were unduly considered

Ratio Decidendi

The Crown failed to establish manifest inadequacy. The aggregate sentence imposed, considering all relevant objective and subjective circumstances, is within the acceptable range, confirmed by statistics and comparable cases. No error or unjust reasoning was demonstrated warranting appellate intervention.

Court Disposition

Crown appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Crown appeal dismissed; no variation to the sentence imposed by the District Court.