R v Jared Deane PATERSON [2010] NSWCCA 233

R v Jared Deane PATERSON [2010] NSWCCA 233

Although the sentence structure did not reflect the preferred approach of accumulation for separate offences, bearing in mind the plea of guilty and special circumstances (rehabilitation prospects, background, mental health), and that the head sentences were within range, no appealable error was found. The overall sentence did not warrant appellate interference as it fell within the discretion and flexibility available to a sentencing judge.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 October 2010
Procedural Posture
Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'crown Appeal' 'armed Robbery' 'accumulation of Sentences' 'manifest Inadequacy' 'special Circumstances' 'non Parole Periods']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether the District Court Judge erred in making non-parole periods wholly concurrent for two separate armed robbery offences' 'Whether the sentence for armed robbery with wounding (s 98 Crimes Act) was manifestly inadequate']

Ratio Decidendi

Although the sentence structure did not reflect the preferred approach of accumulation for separate offences, bearing in mind the plea of guilty and special circumstances (rehabilitation prospects, background, mental health), and that the head sentences were within range, no appealable error was found. The overall sentence did not warrant appellate interference as it fell within the discretion and flexibility available to a sentencing judge.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed.']