Regina v Lee [2004] NSWCCA 133

Regina v Lee [2004] NSWCCA 133

It was open to the jury, on the whole of the evidence including supporting medical evidence and police observations, to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt of the appellant’s guilt on count 2. The circumstances did not require a Markuleski direction, as the jury had been adequately directed to scrutinise the complainant’s evidence and consider the charges separately.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 May 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal against conviction dismissed
Legal Topics
['sexual Assault' 'inconsistent Verdict' 'jury Directions' 'reasonableness of Verdict']
['criminal Law'] ['sexual Assault' 'inconsistent Verdict' 'jury Directions' 'reasonableness of Verdict']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the verdict of guilty on count 2 was unreasonable and not supported by the evidence, especially given verdicts of not guilty on counts 1 and 3' "Whether the trial judge erred in failing to give a Markuleski direction regarding assessment of the complainant's credibility across multiple charges"]

Ratio Decidendi

It was open to the jury, on the whole of the evidence including supporting medical evidence and police observations, to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt of the appellant’s guilt on count 2. The circumstances did not require a Markuleski direction, as the jury had been adequately directed to scrutinise the complainant’s evidence and consider the charges separately.

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction dismissed

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed']