R v McCormack [2015] NSWCCA 221
The Court found that, although the charges are serious, the decision of the prosecution not to proceed on indictment, the respondent's age, lack of violent history, ongoing health issues, compliance with bail, and the prospect of extended pre-sentence custody established that detention was not justified. Subsequently, the Court was satisfied there were no unacceptable risks presented by continuing the respondent's bail with additional conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Bail/detention Application / Decision on Detention Application
- Outcome
- Detention application refused; bail continued with additional conditions
- Legal Topics
- ['bail' 'show Cause Offence' 'detention Application' 'bail Concerns']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bail/detention Application / Decision on Detention Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondent has shown cause why detention is not justified for show cause offences under the Bail Act 2013 (NSW)' 'Whether there are unacceptable bail concerns under the Bail Act 2013 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that, although the charges are serious, the decision of the prosecution not to proceed on indictment, the respondent's age, lack of violent history, ongoing health issues, compliance with bail, and the prospect of extended pre-sentence custody established that detention was not justified. Subsequently, the Court was satisfied there were no unacceptable risks presented by continuing the respondent's bail with additional conditions.
Court Disposition
Detention application refused; bail continued with additional conditions
Orders
- ['Detention application refused' "Conditional bail for the respondent continued with two additional conditions: not to go within 10 kilometres of the Old Bradley's Saw Mill at Gwabegar; not to approach or seek to contact in any way any Crown witnesses, except through legal advisors"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment