R v Quin [2009] NSWCCA 16
The sentence was manifestly inadequate due to errors of double counting in favour of the respondent, giving undue weight to rehabilitation, and failing to accord sufficient weight to the gravity of the offence. The sentence did not reflect the seriousness of the crime. The Court set aside the original sentence and imposed a term of 5 years 6 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 3 years 2 months.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Crown appeal upheld. Sentence set aside. Conviction confirmed. New sentence imposed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'crown Appeal' 'maliciously Inflict Grievous Bodily Harm With Intent' 'standard Non Parole Period' 'double Counting' 'rehabilitation' 'deterrence' 'manifest Inadequacy']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly inadequate' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred in double counting subjective features to depart from the standard non-parole period and as special circumstances' 'Whether undue weight was given to subjective factors such as rehabilitation']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence was manifestly inadequate due to errors of double counting in favour of the respondent, giving undue weight to rehabilitation, and failing to accord sufficient weight to the gravity of the offence. The sentence did not reflect the seriousness of the crime. The Court set aside the original sentence and imposed a term of 5 years 6 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 3 years 2 months.
Court Disposition
Crown appeal upheld. Sentence set aside. Conviction confirmed. New sentence imposed.
Orders
- ['The sentence is set aside.' 'The conviction is confirmed.' 'The respondent is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 5 years 6 months consisting of a non-parole period of 3 years 2 months commencing on 29 November 2007 and expiring on 28 January 2011 with a balance of term of 2 years 4 months commencing on 29...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment