Regina v Scott [2005] NSWCCA 152
The order for periodic detention failed to reflect the objective seriousness of the offences and need for general deterrence; quashing the periodic detention order and confirming the sentence of full-time imprisonment was required to adequately punish and denounce the conduct.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentencing Appeal
- Outcome
- Crown appeal against sentence allowed; periodic detention order quashed; sentences otherwise confirmed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'fraud' 'periodic Detention' 'general Deterrence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentencing Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly inadequate considering the objective seriousness of the offence and general deterrence' 'Whether it was appropriate to order periodic detention for serious fraud offences' 'Whether delay and subjective circumstances justified periodic detention']
Ratio Decidendi
The order for periodic detention failed to reflect the objective seriousness of the offences and need for general deterrence; quashing the periodic detention order and confirming the sentence of full-time imprisonment was required to adequately punish and denounce the conduct.
Court Disposition
Crown appeal against sentence allowed; periodic detention order quashed; sentences otherwise confirmed.
Orders
- ['Order for service of sentence by periodic detention is quashed.' 'On each count respondent is sentenced to imprisonment for two years and six months with a non-parole period of 22 months and 15 days, each to commence on 4 February 2005.' 'Non-parole period to expire on 18 December 2006.' 'Respondent to be released...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment