Regina v Archer [2000] NSWCCA 176

Regina v Archer [2000] NSWCCA 176

The sentencing judge acted within sound sentencing discretion and was not inconsistent with guideline judgment considerations in Henry; the special circumstances of the respondent justified the minimum term imposed, and the disparity between the co-offender and respondent was not unsupportable given the differences in their cases.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 July 2000
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['sentencing Guidelines' 'robbery in Company' 'penalty Disparity' 'rehabilitation' 'youthful Offender']
['criminal Law'] ['sentencing Guidelines' 'robbery in Company' 'penalty Disparity' 'rehabilitation' 'youthful Offender']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the minimum term imposed was manifestly inadequate for the offence of robbery in company' "Whether the disparity between the co-offender's and respondent's sentences was unsupportable"]

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge acted within sound sentencing discretion and was not inconsistent with guideline judgment considerations in Henry; the special circumstances of the respondent justified the minimum term imposed, and the disparity between the co-offender and respondent was not unsupportable given the differences in their cases.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.']