R v Van Ryn (No 2) [2016] NSWCCA 160
The error in referring to the wrong statutory provision (s 61M(2) instead of s 61M(1)) and the associated maximum penalty and standard non-parole period does not render the aggregate sentence 'contrary to law' within the meaning of s 43, as the penalty imposed was within the court's power and a reconsideration could only occur by way of appeal, not under s 43.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application to Reopen Sentencing
- Outcome
- Application by the Crown to reopen sentencing under s 43 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 is refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'error Correction' 'aggregate Sentences' 'statutory Construction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application to Reopen Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether s 43 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 empowers the court to reopen proceedings when there is an error referring to the offence provision, maximum penalty, and standard non-parole period;' "Whether the aggregate sentence imposed was 'contrary to law' within the meaning of s 43"]
Ratio Decidendi
The error in referring to the wrong statutory provision (s 61M(2) instead of s 61M(1)) and the associated maximum penalty and standard non-parole period does not render the aggregate sentence 'contrary to law' within the meaning of s 43, as the penalty imposed was within the court's power and a reconsideration could only occur by way of appeal, not under s 43.
Court Disposition
Application by the Crown to reopen sentencing under s 43 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 is refused.
Orders
- ['The application by the Crown to reopen the sentencing of the respondent pursuant to s 43 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment