Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Presnell [2022] NSWCCA 146
On the accepted facts, the respondent intentionally hid his conduct from the child, evidencing no intention to engage or direct the act towards the child. Therefore, the evidence could not establish that the accused intentionally carried out a sexual act 'towards' the child within the meaning of s 66DC(a) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), and the permanent stay was correctly ordered.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Interlocutory Appeal / Appeal Against Permanent Stay Ordered by Primary Judge
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeals' 'sexual Offences Against Children' 'statutory Interpretation' 'permanent Stay of Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Interlocutory Appeal / Appeal Against Permanent Stay Ordered by Primary Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether s 66DC(a) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) creates two offences of committing a sexual act 'with' or 'towards' a child or one composite offence;" "Whether the act alleged against the respondent was 'towards' the complainant within the meaning of s 66DC(a);" 'Whether the evidence could establish that the accused intentionally masturbated towards the child.']
Ratio Decidendi
On the accepted facts, the respondent intentionally hid his conduct from the child, evidencing no intention to engage or direct the act towards the child. Therefore, the evidence could not establish that the accused intentionally carried out a sexual act 'towards' the child within the meaning of s 66DC(a) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), and the permanent stay was correctly ordered.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment