REGINA v. CROWDEY [1999] NSWCCA 24
The original sentence was manifestly inadequate given the length and seriousness of the offending, and failed to sufficiently address general deterrence; allowing for all mitigating factors, the court substituted a sentence of four years imprisonment with a non-parole period of two and a half years.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'crown Appeal' 'manifest Inadequacy' 'mental Condition' 'duress' 'general Deterrence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly inadequate' "Consideration of respondent's mental condition as a mitigating factor" 'Appropriate exercise of discretion in Crown appeals against sentence' 'Constraint on sentence imposed in Crown appeals' 'Role of general deterrence in sentencing for drug importation']
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence was manifestly inadequate given the length and seriousness of the offending, and failed to sufficiently address general deterrence; allowing for all mitigating factors, the court substituted a sentence of four years imprisonment with a non-parole period of two and a half years.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- ['original sentence quashed' 'respondent sentenced to four years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of two and a half years, both commencing 15 October 1997' 'non-parole period to expire on 14 April 2000' 'legal representatives to explain the effect of the sentence to the respondent pursuant to s 16F of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment