REGINA v. CROWDEY [1999] NSWCCA 24

REGINA v. CROWDEY [1999] NSWCCA 24

The original sentence was manifestly inadequate given the length and seriousness of the offending, and failed to sufficiently address general deterrence; allowing for all mitigating factors, the court substituted a sentence of four years imprisonment with a non-parole period of two and a half years.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 March 1999
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'crown Appeal' 'manifest Inadequacy' 'mental Condition' 'duress' 'general Deterrence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Sentence

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly inadequate' "Consideration of respondent's mental condition as a mitigating factor" 'Appropriate exercise of discretion in Crown appeals against sentence' 'Constraint on sentence imposed in Crown appeals' 'Role of general deterrence in sentencing for drug importation']

Ratio Decidendi

The original sentence was manifestly inadequate given the length and seriousness of the offending, and failed to sufficiently address general deterrence; allowing for all mitigating factors, the court substituted a sentence of four years imprisonment with a non-parole period of two and a half years.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • ['original sentence quashed' 'respondent sentenced to four years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of two and a half years, both commencing 15 October 1997' 'non-parole period to expire on 14 April 2000' 'legal representatives to explain the effect of the sentence to the respondent pursuant to s 16F of the...