Regina v PHAM [2004] NSWCCA 263
The term 'court' in s59 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 refers to the institution of the Court of Criminal Appeal and not specifically to the same judges who quashed or varied the original sentence, so the current bench had power to perform the variation sought by the Crown.
- Parties
- Appellant: Regina; Respondent: Vu Ngoc PHAM
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Variation of Sentence Commencement Under S59 Crimes (sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Sentence Commencement, Construction of 'court' in Sentencing Legislation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Appellant
Vu Ngoc PHAM
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Variation of Sentence Commencement Under S59 Crimes (sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the reference to 'court' in s59 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 refers to the institution or only the original sentencing bench
- 2 Whether the Court of Criminal Appeal, differently constituted, may vary the commencement of another sentence after quashing a sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The term 'court' in s59 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 refers to the institution of the Court of Criminal Appeal and not specifically to the same judges who quashed or varied the original sentence, so the current bench had power to perform the variation sought by the Crown.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- The sentence imposed by Acting Judge Stewart on 19 September 2003 is varied pursuant to section 59 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 so that the sentence commences on 24 March 2000 and expires on 23 September 2010 and the non-parole period commences on 24 March 2000 and expires on 23 March 2006.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment