R v X [2016] NSWCCA 265

R v X [2016] NSWCCA 265

The respondent breached a clear undertaking to give evidence in accordance with his signed statement, which had been the basis for a sentencing discount. His evidence at trial materially contradicted that undertaking and undermined the Crown's case, particularly regarding self-defence. There were no sufficient discretionary reasons not to intervene, and the sentence was varied accordingly.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 December 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Sentence (crown Appeal)
Outcome
Crown appeal allowed. Respondent re-sentenced.
Legal Topics
['sentence' 'crown Appeal' 'assistance to Authorities' 'breach of Undertaking' 'discount on Sentence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Sentence (crown Appeal)

  1. 1 ['Did the respondent breach his undertaking to provide evidence in accordance with his statement?' 'Should the Court exercise its discretion to intervene and vary the sentence following such a breach?']

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent breached a clear undertaking to give evidence in accordance with his signed statement, which had been the basis for a sentencing discount. His evidence at trial materially contradicted that undertaking and undermined the Crown's case, particularly regarding self-defence. There were no sufficient discretionary reasons not to intervene, and the sentence was varied accordingly.

Court Disposition

Crown appeal allowed. Respondent re-sentenced.

Orders

  • ['The Crown appeal is allowed.' 'The respondent is sentenced to imprisonment for a period of 6 weeks, commencing on 9 December 2016 and expiring on 19 January 2017.']